Talk:Harbourne Stephen/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Pickersgill-Cunliffe in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 16:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Will get to this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Prelim

edit
  • No edit wars
  • Images correctly licensed
  • Earwig reports copyvio unlikely

Lede and infobox

edit
  • "destroyed a number of aircraft" might as well provide the number here
  • "several operations" of what type?
  • "commanded a fighter wing" provide the name here even if it's a red link - also add the red link into the infobox
  • Perhaps include in the lede his winning of the DSO and the DFCs
  • Add 602 Sdn to commands in infobox
  • Burma campaign not specifically mentioned in text

Early life

edit
  • "educated privately" does this mean at home or something else? I was educated privately, but it was very much still at school..!
  • "shifted" moved?
  • "Stephen initially worked"
  • "gained the requisite flying hours"?
  • Link Second World War, and perhaps a date too (although you might think it too obvious)

Second World War

edit
  • "No. 11 Group Fighter Pool" is this the type of unit that might deserve a red link?
  • "He was then" can you provide a timeframe at all?
  • "Stephen's section leader was the pilot that first engaged the enemy" not sure how relevant this is. Perhaps replace with an explanation that the squadron did not shoot it down, and subsequently No. 43 Sqn..?
  • "once the Battle of Britain commenced" when?
  • "The squadron was moved to No. 12 Group" where were they before? wasn't too obvious it was No. 11 despite the earlier fighter pool mention
  • "some 30 miles" is "some" necessary?
  • "the squadron was equipped" and "was operating"
  • Mk > Mark
  • " In mid-November" considering this is in relation to a three-kill day, suggest providing date
  • "in just six"
  • "he was seconded.." when?
  • "He was mentioned in despatches on 17 March" do you think this from his operational days or because of work at Farnborough?
  • "and then, on 1 April..." this sentence says 1 April twice
  • "In June 1941" rem repeated year
  • "formation member" not sure this has an obvious meaning
  • "Mk Vb" again suggest changing to mark
  • "convoy patrols" protecting convoys or attacking them?
  • "After a period of command of No. 234 Squadron" woah! this squadron command comes out of nowhere. is there any more detail?
  • "served as a wing leader" of what?
  • "operating from Chittagong" doing what?
  • "held the rank of wing commander" promotion date?
  • " subsequently held staff postings..." considering this period seems to stretch from 1942 to 1945, would be useful to have some dates to clarify when/where he was doing what
  • "He had been credited"?
  • Was it just the claimed kills that were unconfirmed, or the probables and damages too?

Later life

edit
  • "entailed a move to Glasgow" have you said where he was before? If not, suggest "was based in Glasgow"
  • "emergency commission" for any particular reason?
  • " Royal Auxiliary Air Forceto" interesting link!
  • When did his RAAF role end?
  • "He then became managing director at The Daily Telegraph" when?
  • "helped to found the Raleigh International charity" when?
  • Having a look at internet archive suggests there might be a little more to write about his newspaper work and exploration/expedition support, but only minor details
  • I think coverage is reasonable for GA. If I take this to A-class, I will scout around but it is not in my plans to develop this one beyond GA anyway. Zawed (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
  • References look good. See above comments on possible further inclusions.

@Zawed: That's all I've got for a first run through. My apologies for the long wait! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe: thanks for taking a look at this. I have responded above and with various edits to the article. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Zawed: I'm happy with the changes you've made, having done a couple of minor edits myself. I should have made it more clear that the "minor details" were totally optional, and I agree that they're not needed to fulfil the GA criteria. Passing this article. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply