Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song)

Hard to Love (Blackpink song) is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by Lililolol (talk) at 18:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

An editor has reviewed the article, and left comments on the review page. However, this editor has requested a second opinion either from a more experienced reviewer, or someone with more expertise on this subject, to gain further consensus that this article meets the good article criteria. In the meantime, editors are encouraged to revise the article based on the first reviewer's comments.

Note: Requesting another experienced editor to give this a second look, as the reviewer has been indefinitely blocked for violating site policy. Thank you.

This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 17 November 2022. The result of the discussion was retarget.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 1 January 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hard to Love (Rosé song) → Hard to Love (Blackpink song) – The song is credited with Blackpink as the artist. Examples of similar songs credited to a group with one member's vocals are Epiphany (BTS song) and Euphoria (BTS song). Flabshoe1 (talk) 23:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Latest comment: 8 days ago5 comments3 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hard to Love (Blackpink song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Lililolol (talk · contribs) 18:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Royiswariii (talk · contribs) 12:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	the phrase Meanwhile, 'On the Ground' peaked... could rephrase and clearer flow. In, Welxer explained that he was 'intimidated at first', because.... the comma should be inside the quotation marks. The sentence The city pop-esque is built around soft piano... could a little bit confusing, please rephrase for clarification.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	per 1a comment.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	looks good.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	looks good.
	2c. it contains no original research.	looks good.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	there is a little copyvio detected by Earwig's, about 26.5%. Although, it wasn't concerning but I'm recommend to change a little bit too, target: 15% below. Check it on Copyright vio detector.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	In, ...it turned out better than he could have ever imagined" and "Generally, it's never as good as it was in your head, [but] this was an exception. Although looks like a quote but you need too be neutral tone or if you want to keep it, add a quote box and add a summary on the quote.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Where's the album cover? add a non-free album cover.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Hold this until Lililolol addresses all what i suggested or Recommended. Royiswariii Talk! 15:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC) (GA Reviewer)Reply

@Royiswariii everything is finished except for the album cover. Since the song isn’t a single, it doesn’t have its own cover. Lililolol (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lililolol, you might want to ask for a second opinion on this review, as the reviewer has been indefinitely blocked for account sharing. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 10:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic