Talk:Harder to Breathe

Good articleHarder to Breathe has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2009Good article nomineeListed


GA Review

edit

I cant do the review but looking quickly I'd be inclined to say this looks OK, *with* 2 changes to the lead. 1.Once it's said, it's said. No one likes to hear a story twice. I sure don't want to re-read anything, not even half way. So literally repeating or re-using sentences found in the lead is annoying.

This: "...the label informed the band to keep writing more material, Levine wrote the song in frustration of the pressure." comes up more than once. Once is it; & I feel it reads better where it's more developed, later on. So for the lead I'd maybe just stick more with 'the song expresses tension, having been written quickly under trying circumstances' - something as a teaser for fuller details later on.

2. Watch that you say what you mean. ie., "Breathe" was met with positive reception by music critics, who noted the track's general sound." ew, so it has a 'general sound'? I'm a musician and I still dunno what that means. Is this alleged "general sound" a good thing? Or is the term "general sound" filler? ... or did you maybe forget something? Like "the general sound of ka-ching"?

Luck Hilarleo Hey,L.E.O. 00:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Harder to Breathe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quick fail criteria assessment

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
    •  
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
    •  
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
    •  
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
    •  
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
    •  

No problems with quick fail criteria, moving to main review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):  
    • Broad....
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Harder to Breathe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harder to Breathe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Harder to Breathe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is it me or does the guitar sound like Brainstew/Jaded?

edit

Basically what the title says, except the chorus Waterlemon147 (talk) 23:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply