Talk:Hari's on Tour (Express)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Paul MacDermott (talk · contribs) 20:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Happy to take this on, I'll read through it and do a review in the next few days. Paul MacDermott (talk) 20:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

My first impression of this is good. Well written and sourced, and interesting. I'll do another pass through it a bit later on and go through the checklist, but it seems fine. Paul MacDermott (talk) 14:23, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Checklist criteria

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	I reviewed this through text to speech so just need someone to check the punctuation for me. Checked (yeepsi)
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No images here so not applicable
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	N/A
	7. Overall assessment.	Seems ok, but I'll pop it on hold until the punctuation's been checked. Once that's done I'll pass this. :ok, everything good now so I'll update the talk page.

2nd opinion

I'll look over it within the next hour. Best, yeepsi (Talk tonight) 09:49, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Prose has been checked. Best, yeepsi (Talk tonight) 10:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Grand, thanks for that. I can update this now. Congrats again JG on another good article. Paul MacDermott (talk) 12:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Wow, that's great. Thanks as always for your time, Paul MacD – and to you Yeepsi (for making this quick and painless ;) ... I might end up adding a pic after all – the tour programme cover, because it seems relevant on a couple of fronts – but I'll let you both know if I do. Big thanks again! JG66 (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC)