 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability?
editHarley Benton is just a label name with no history nor distinctive qualities other than being the regular low-cost China-made instruments. Does it really deserve to be on the Wikipedia ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Korgogro (talk • contribs) 13:25, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Korgogro!
- Please follow talk-page guidelines and avoid soapboxing. Our personal opinions are usually best kept to ourselves, and we should focus on what reliable sources say. The article does have references, and I removed statements that appeared to be non-factual. I don't have the time to improve the article.
- There is at least one apparently reliable source discussing Thomann and HB, so there is no reason to consider deleting this article on Thomann and HB.
- I also asked for opinions about the reliability of The Music News, which is a trade journal, but received no response.
- Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
It's a corporate adsheet. I've tagged it as such.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 04:35, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Weblinks in the article
editI don't know how it is in the English Wikipedia, but in the German weblinks in the flow text aren't welcome? I suggest it is the same here and so the Weblinks, maybe they should be the source, aren't suitable. --Jönd (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2013 (UTC)