Talk:Harmony Airways

Untitled

How should we phrase "free headset" as headsets are given out on all flights regardless of class. I received one on a flight from Vancouver to Maui, in economy yet i'm not totally sure if that applies for all routes. Tawker 06:01, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Free headsets

Free headsets are indeed offer by Harmony on all its routes, regardless of the class of service.

Perhaps the general description should be updated to "and in-flight entertainment (free headsets)." and it taken out of harmonyone?

Kirk

2112 MST 24-Nov-05

---

Merge Harmony Vacations

The page for Harmony Vacations reads like a bit of promotional fluff. There was an objection to deleting it, but failing that, I think it should be merged into here. It seems a non-notable sub-operation of this airline. -- Gnetwerker 22:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Merger

I vote no. The size of the information in Vacations would make the Harmony Airways page quite long.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kirkfurlotte (talk • contribs) 10:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC-7)

Problem solved. Page is merged, shorter, and doesn't read quite so much like PR copy. -- Gnetwerker 06:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Companion Class

Would anyone mind digging through the article history and find the article where Companion Class still existed? It would be nice to have it in the article just as a reference. Dion 07:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Airline Shutdown

I have heard from higher up employees that the airline may not be offering charter services, and may just end all flights. A large number of employees are being layed off. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lego1496 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC-7)

TfD nomination of Template:Harmony Airways

Template:Harmony Airways has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Hawaiian717 00:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Reasons for Failure

POV / OR, anyone?Geoffreynham 15:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo harmony.gif

Image:Logo harmony.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Coming back ???

About a year ago they removed the sign from the head office, but about 2 months ago they put it back up. Anyone have any info on this? I can't find any on the net. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.121.221.12 (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

NPOV?

Parts of the History section sound like they are making conclusions and/or an argument. I'm not too familiar with this area - but is it sounding WP:NPOV compliant? It doesn't really to me. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)