Talk:Harold Ellis (surgeon)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis needs more information added to it.
Hi, I thought that this article could stay because Professor Ellis should be considered notable: he is a published author (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cambridge-Illustrated-History-Surgery-Harold/dp/0521720338), and extremely highly regarded within his field. Indeed, he is a fellow of the Royal Society of Surgeons (FRCS) and a few of the guidelines in the Notability (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PROF) are met. Hope this clarifies my position and holds this article in a better standing (although it really needs more work!) Thanks! Daryl Cheng 09:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darylcheng (talk • contribs)
Seconded. Professor Ellis should be considered notable. His book, Clinical Anatomy Ellis, H. Mahadevan, V. (2010), now is in it's 14th edition can be considered a definitive resource offering medical students, postgraduate trainees and junior doctors a comprehensive resource in their training. Professor Ellis has been published multiple times, been featured in the media, and is renowned in the medical field.
It should be noted that this entry is missing a more detailed timeline of education, work, and press/ media features. Stew-dreamt-roger-betaken (talk) 09:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)