Talk:Harold Laski

Alleged scientist

Laski is called a scientist in the article. His field is said to be economics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.108.96 (talk) 13:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC) The talk about science has vanished now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.171.194 (talk) 11:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Novel

A novel, by Miss Rand or anyone else, should have no part in a biography. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.108.96 (talk) 14:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Alleged Economist.

Laski was not an economist, and in fact the lack of competent economic analysis in his work is seen as a major failing of his. It is said in Michael Newman's 'Harold Laski: A Political Biography' that his magnum opus, a Grammar of Politics, had the failing of prioritising moral questions over economic ones, with a consequent lack of competent analysis. This should be corrected - his field was political science, not economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfehenson (talk • contribs) 12:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Neutrality

The statement in the introduction he had few original ideas and is no longer widely read is biased and (partly) wrong. What Wolfehenson pointed out, above, that he prioritized ethics over economics, could be a virtue (pun intended ;-) rather than a failing from another perspective. Some would even argue that the classical liberal icon and moral philosopher Adam Smith shared this opinion. Only some 20th century economists did not - and consequently have run into deep trouble.--Olag (talk) 09:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harold Laski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100207224741/http://www.flonnet.com/fl2224/stories/20051202005812900.htm to http://www.flonnet.com/fl2224/stories/20051202005812900.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)