Talk:Harpegnathos alperti
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Lightburst in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | A fact from Harpegnathos alperti appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 15:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
( )
Harpegnathos alperti worker ant
- ... that the Harpegnathos alperti (pictured) ant species was described from a banana and narra plantation on Luzon? Source: D.E.M. General (2016) page 101 fig8 collection label of only known specimen.
- ALT1: ... that workers of Harpegnathos alperti (pictured) ants have black heads and chocolate mandibles? Source: D.E.M. General (2016) page 103 "Body black; mandibles and antennae chocolate brown; legs yellowish chocolate-brown."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ameerega munduruku
Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 16:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Harpegnathos alperti; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Article moved to mainspace 19 January. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. QPQ is done. Hooks are interesting and sourced. Narra might be good to be linked in the hook as readers may not know what that is. Looks good to go. Thriley (talk) 20:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Kevmin and Thriley: Since the article does not call out the black head, I imagine we are using the image of the head in the article to portray that? Also you have to move the citation to just after the hook fact (chocolate mandibles) in the article so I will do that now. Not sure it will pass interesting, but the facts in ALT1 are not neatly in the article. Lightburst (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)