Talk:Harry Beadles

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Harry Beadles/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 03:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  


  • "...he struggled to establish himself in the first team..." This may be a difference in Canadian English and (presumably, if not sorry) Welsh English, but shouldn't it be "on the first team"? If not just ignore this
  • "Beadles never played a senior game for the Owls first-team..." Clarify who the Owls are.
  • While his regiment were stationed in Britain on training exercises, Beadles was a bugle boy but, in 1915, his unit took part in the landing at Suvla Bay in Gallipoli where, despite still being under the minimum age, he served on the frontline as a rifleman. This sentence is somewhat unwieldy, and is probably best broken up into two: While his regiment were (or was?, again possibly difference in dialect here) stationed in Britain on training exercises, Beadles was a bugle boy. In 1915 his unit took part in the landing at Suvla Bay in Gallipoli... Or something like that.
  • "His brother Ewart was awarded..." Just because you talk about Beadles's uncle in the previous sentence, it would be better to say it was "Beadles' brother Ewart," as the current phrasing implies it was the uncle's brother.
  • " Beadles often commented on his role at the company..." Who did he comment to?
  • "...making just 18 appearances in all competitions during his three years at the club..." Try to be consistent with using either spelt-out numbers or digits, especially in the same sentence (I believe MOS says under 20 should be spelt out, but so long as it's consistent I'll be happy).
  • "...where his friend George Latham was working on the training staff." Source on this?
  • "...as the Bluebirds reached their first FA Cup final." Should clarify who the Bluebirds are.
  • "During his time with the Sandgrounders..." Again, who they are. I realise it refers to the club, but it should be a little more apparent.
  • "However, he soon retired from football..." Just "he retired from football."
  • References: 22 is a deadlink. Actually reference 23 is dead.

Once the above are dealt with it should be good. Kaiser matias (talk) 03:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Kaiser matias: Thanks very much for taking the time to review the article. I think I've addressed all of the above issues. The only one I didn't was the dead link reference which seems to be working ok for me. Kosack (talk) 06:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
That would be my fault, I typed the wrong thing. It's reference 23, "Football League player list." Sorry for the confusion, but other than that everything looks good. Kaiser matias (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
I've swapped the ref out for a working one to fix the issue. Kosack (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Looks good to me. Kaiser matias (talk) 14:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry Beadles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply