Talk:Hartshorn Memorial Cannon

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

United States: New Hampshire

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Mid-importance).

Notability issues - merge articles?

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

This article is always going to be very short, and as well as that, it may be difficult to establish notability. Might it be an idea to merge it into the article on Lyndeborough, New Hampshire? There would always be a redirect left from here to there. Etrigan (talk) 13:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good idea--but with the info I just added on the cannon, it would look out of place on the Lyndeborough page (which doesn't have a lot of info on it right now). Eventually I'll try to put together a South Lyndeborough village page, and maybe it could go there instead? --Naturebunny1 —Preceding undated comment added 15:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC).

Another possibility is a page on Lyndeborough war memorials. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.131.97.203 (talk) 04:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oppose merge. It's fine where it is for now. I actually notice the opposite problem more often, where someone puts a lot of detail about one site of interest into the general town page, and it needs to be split off, so I commend Naturebunny1 for sticking to individual articles, which are well-written and researched, by the way. A South Lyndeborough village page would be a good solution when you get to it.--Ken Gallager (talk) 12:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have a lot of respect for the work Ken Gallager has done on New Hampshire-related articles, and I agree with what he says. (I'm also flattered by the compliment--thanks!) In fairness, Etrigan's suggestion came within seconds of the article's creation, when the article consisted of only one or two sentences. (Serves me right for not using the sandbox.) Eventually I can see merging this with an article on the South Lyndeborough village common OR Lyndeborough war memorials in general (currently there are only four including the cannon). For now, I guess I would prefer to stick with Ken's suggestion. Naturebunny1 (talk) 00:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm still not sure about notability, but the article's much better now. I'll strip the tags. Etrigan (talk) 07:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic