Talk:Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation
 | Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 12, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation provided most of the plywood material for the Spirit of St. Louis (pictured), which Charles Lindbergh flew on a record-breaking transatlantic flight in 1927? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | |||||||||||||
 | This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
 | This non-existent page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 00:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Looking at this one. —Ed!(talk) 00:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written:
- The lead sections should be expanded to give a concise summary of the whole article. See WP:LEAD for a bit more on this.
- "came in sizes up to seven and a half feet wide by fifty feet long." -- use the {{convert}} template for our friends on the metric system if you could.
- Any idea who the original founders of the Haskelite company was, or who provided the capital for it? I see some names in the infobox that should be discussed.
- "The plant was located on 107 acres of land near the Fuller Station." -- again, convert template here.
- How much did the facility cost?
- Convert 50 mph, I think knots would be preferred for a seaborne vehicle.
- Some of the Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation references can be shortened, to the company or the factory or something like that.
- Any numbers on revenue, volume produced or number of employees? Again seeing an employee number in the infobox but not a date or anything like that.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- Seeing plenty of refs.
- It is broad in its coverage:
- Pass no problems.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is stable:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- All images look appropriately tagged for copyright.
- Other:
- Dup links, external links, copyvio and dup links tools all look good.
- Source spotcheck Refs 6, 16, 30 all match up to what's cited in the article.
- On hold pending some improvements. —Ed!(talk) 01:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Ed!: I believe I have answered all the issues you brought up. Can you look it over. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work on this one! Passing GA. —Ed!(talk) 13:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
A GAR has been started for Haskelite at Talk:Haskelite which may impact and raise some issues relating to both this page and the Haskell Manufacturing Company. Gusfriend (talk) 04:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
editThis article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)