Wikipedia

Talk:Hassocks

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Paolo.oprandi in topic Notable buildings and areas
Learn more about this page

Notable buildings and areas

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I will be adding a notable buildings and areas section shortly, which will largely seek to increase the account of the biodiversity of the area. I may add to or move some of the landmarks text accordingly. Paolo.oprandi (talk) 08:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

The war

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Article says "The village came into existence when construction of the railway was halted by the war". Which war was that? I think it ought to be specified. --A bit iffy 12:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Film

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I note having just watched it that the Jack and Jill mills are pivotal in this Michael Caine movie "The Black Windmill" from 1974, especially the climax: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071229/ I leave one of the locals to add it to the main text and delete this note as its not really my page to edit. ...Enjoy your place in movie history! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.92.230.173 (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Automated Peer Review

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to wikicommons or integrating images with the text.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 5260 metres, use 5260 metres, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 5260 metres.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.[?]
  •   Done Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.

For further guidelines on UK settlement articles please see WP:UKTOWNS. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 06:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Should this article have a gallery? See WP:IG for the relevant policy. I personally think it comes the section One rule of thumb to consider: if, due to its content, a gallery would only lend itself to a title along the lines of "Gallery" or "Images of Hassocks", as opposed to a more descriptive title, the gallery should either be revamped or moved to the Commons. The full descriptions, plus the fact that some of them are not on Commons, prevents me from being bold and unilaterally removing the gallery. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 05:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • From my point of view, and I guess I am biased as I contributed at least a couple of the photos, is that the photos and their descriptions add valuable information to the article. As an example Butchers Wood would never require an article of its own, it doesn't require a photo/mention in the Hassocks article but anyone who doesn't know Hassocks and wants to visit would possibly find it useful and interesting to know that there is an ancient woodland alongside the village. --Paste Let’s have a chat. 06:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I am not suggesting removing any photos and text, just the way they are arranged in a gallery. To me, it looks more like a picture book or travel guide than an encyclopaedia. I would use the text to expand the articles under the appropriate sections, illustrated by the pictures. For example, Butchers Wood would come under the section heading of Landmarks. MortimerCat (talk) 06:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
My apologies, I misunderstood you, in that case if I was you have a go at rearranging and let's see what it looks like. --Paste Let’s have a chat. 07:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
My current project is adding a landmark section to the parish articles, and by coincidence Hassocks was next on my list! MortimerCat (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Which platform are the Lifts going to be installed?

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
"The station is due for redevelopment in 2013, with the addition of lifts on either platform."

I'm assuming this should read "...lifts on both platforms."??? 193.113.37.9 (talk) 14:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Indeed; now reworded accordingly. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 15:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
The original looked alright to me, meaning a lift on each.--Charles (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think it was a colloquial use of the word "either." Generally, "either" tends to imply that one of two possibilities is true, but not both. I think "both" is a better word to use here. 193.113.37.9 (talk) 10:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Hassocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hassocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hassocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hassocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hassocks&oldid=1207584972"