Talk:Hatfields & McCoys (miniseries)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Historical facts section

edit

Telecineguy is attempting to note the differences between the series and the actual feud. Is this necessary and can it be fully verified? — WylieCoyote (talk) 23:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

If the historical inaccuracies can be documented with reliable sources, then yes I think it is helpful to include it in the article for a program based on historical events. Rreagan007 (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Trut-h-urts man has removed the section because it was "unreferenced, original research trivia", according to the edit history. — WylieCoyote (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Fair enough Telecine Guy 03:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hatfields & McCoys (miniseries). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply