Talk:Haunted (Laura Les song)

Latest comment: 15 days ago by Launchballer in topic Did you know nomination

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Haunted (Laura Les song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 16:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 03:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  • "On the inspiration for "Haunted", Laura Les said:" → maybe just "Laura Les described the song as 'mostly...'"
    • Done
  • "first played at the A2B2 Night of Fire festival" → where is that?
    • Added (it was virtual)
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
  • Dog Show Records, Les writing/production credits, and track length needs refs in the body
    • Done
  • I'm a little confused on the release date. Exclaim article was published on March 11 – was it not released then?
    • Probably something related to time zones? All streaming services say it was released on the 12th.
  2c. it contains no original research.
  2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall assessment.

Nice article. Best, Heartfox (talk) 04:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Heartfox: done! Skyshiftertalk 18:24, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Skyshifter: Promoted. If you have time, my current GAN for Outside (Mariah Carey song) is in need of a review. Thanks, Heartfox (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Skyshifter: If interested, would you like to nominate this to WP:DYK? This article might work well with a Hallowe'en set that will run on Oct. 31. Z1720 (talk) 18:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Z1720: good idea! I will nominate it. Skyshiftertalk 22:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 13:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that the song "Haunted" blends cuteness and spookiness?
Improved to Good Article status by Skyshifter (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Skyshiftertalk 17:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC).Reply

  •   Recently promoted to GA, longer than 1,500 characters. No copyvio found in a couple of source checks, including for the hook, and earwig is clear. QPQ is done. Hook is supported, I understand the interest aspect is met for the Halloween set. CMD (talk) 12:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply