Talk:Hawaii Sesquicentennial half dollar/GA1

GA Review

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 21:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    Earwig's Copyvio Detector says 0 % violations unlikely. That's about as clean as it can get on that issue.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Nominator created the article August 25, 2015, and has been the primary editor on the article since then.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    • 1928 50C Hawaiian.jpg (image of coin) - Public Domain
    • Hawaii stamp.JPG (postage stamp issued 1928) - Public Domain
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
    Captions provided
    Need WP:ALT, per WP:CAP
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    The only thing missing is the ALT text in the images. Everything else looks great. — Maile (talk) 13:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
    @Wehwalt: has added the ALT text. This nomination passes. — Maile (talk) 21:40, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.