This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
I don't understand why this page would be considered a violation and the link to its homepage needs to be removed. Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plin (talk • contribs)
It would help make me feel that you were here to improve Wikipedia rather than just promote these hotels, if you were to adopt a few Wikipedia standards like wikifying your work and signing talk page comments with ~~~~. Perhaps I am being overly picky but the first thing I see on the Hawthorn home page is a "quick reservations" form - which looks to me like blatant advertising. I tried to find a page on the site which was informative and not written in terrible advertising copy - and I could not find one! The best I can suggest is a link to the Hawthorne Experience. (As an example of what I was looking for, here is a link to an hotel website which I am happy to put into Wikipedia.) But put back whatever link you want - it's American so I don't care! (I may be a bit more fussy about St Martin's Lane!) -- RHaworth18:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Okay I see. I thought it made sense to bring people to a site's homepage since well, it's the homepage. But I understand now, got it. Hopefully I'll do a good job with St Martin's Lane.--Plin14:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}