Talk:Hay lot

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

A little confusion

edit

According to the opening, "A hay lot" is used to mark the position of a "hay lot". This does not make clear sense. Perhaps the subject should be "hay lot marker"? Chris the speller yack 02:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've reworded the opening sentance. I'm happy that the article remains as hay lot, since marker stones are just a part of the subject, although I've drawn a blank so far on any other agricultural/historical information on the subject Pahazzard (talk) 12:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


The information in the article are not verifiable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon2929 (talkcontribs) 05:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hay lot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply