Talk:Haynes–Shockley experiment

This page is mostly in Russian ? Corrigann 22:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, it is in Slovenian. I thought I would have enough time to make a proper translation but it will have to wait for a week or two more. Don't worry, I didn't forget I have to translate it. But when it's done, I would appreciate some copyediting, since I am not sure whether such a detailed analysis is suitable for WP. And if anyone can find who Haynes is... --Ton e 13:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tagged article for nomenc. clarification

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Similar situation to Diffusion current#Derivation.

Could whoever wrote the article please clarify some of the less-obvious symbols (p, n, μ etc )? I tried fixing some of the obvious notation (E, J, Φ etc.) and added links, though by all means correct anything I could have possibly done wrong. Thanks for clarification. =) F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 07:42, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Unit error

Many equations are missing a factor of charge or charge^-1 to have their units correct, for example, in the equation for number density it should be:

$.mw-parser-output .sfrac{white-space:nowrap}.mw-parser-output .sfrac.tion,.mw-parser-output .sfrac .tion{display:inline-block;vertical-align:-0.5em;font-size:85%;text-align:center}.mw-parser-output .sfrac .num{display:block;line-height:1em;margin:0.0em 0.1em;border-bottom:1px solid}.mw-parser-output .sfrac .den{display:block;line-height:1em;margin:0.1em 0.1em}.mw-parser-output .sr-only{border:0;clip:rect(0,0,0,0);clip-path:polygon(0px 0px,0px 0px,0px 0px);height:1px;margin:-1px;overflow:hidden;padding:0;position:absolute;width:1px}⁠∂n/∂t⁠ = ⁠1/q⁠ ⁠∂j/∂x⁠ - ⁠n/𝜏⁠$

Is written without the charge:

$⁠ \partial n / \partial t ⁠ = ⁠ \partial j / \partial x ⁠ - ⁠ n / 𝜏 ⁠$

16:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Add topic