This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
"It was written by" → "The song was written by" but the writing credits need to be directly written in prose in the body because this is a rule for everything quoted in the lead
The next sentence should be the one about the song's single release
"originate from Brad's" → "originated from Brad Roberts'"
Mention about the story of the lyrics in the above sentence, as you are only referencing the origins currently
You should add a sentence about the accompanying music video's release date and the synopsis before its controversy, plus move the video info to the end of the second para
"The song and subsequent video generated controversy" → "The video generated controversy" because only that part is sourced and maybe reword this if it is too repetitive with the synopsis part when you add that here
"it as the first single from A Worm's Life" → "it as the lead single from the album" with the wikilink
"It is the band's highest-peaking" → "The song is Crash Test Dummies' highest-peaking"
It is only notable that the position was in 1996, so remove the month
"The single failed to chart" → ""He Liked to Feel It" failed to chart"
I've tended to everything here; however, I can't find a release date for the video. I don't see one on the Billboard ref, and considering this song isn't well-known, I doubt I'll find one. Any recommendations? ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Retitle to Background and composition since there is notable info missing that can be added
"of the third verse of" → "of the ending of" on the audio sample text, as no verse numbers are sourced
Start the section by adding the writing and production credits, which can be followed by the recording sentence
"intended as dark humour," → "intended as dark humor," with the target (the article is in American English)
Remove the introduction to Brad Roberts as the lead singer because that has already been done in the lead
A second para should be started by adding the info about instrumentation credited in the liner notes, plus include "He began to..." and the other sentence in this para
Move the release info to being at the start of the following section, mentioning the date it was released and using the third studio album introduction there
Concerns:
Crash Test Dummies are Canadian, so shouldn't we be using Canadian English?
Regarding the instrumentation, the liner notes of A Worm's Life don't say which tracks the band members contributed to, and I don't think harmonica, melodica, or theremin are played on this track, so what do I do about Benjamin Darvill?
I'm a bit confused about your last bullet regarding release info. You say to move it to the start of the following section...but I don't see any release info in this section. Could you please clarify? ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
ResolutionsPerMinute Sorry, I forgot that Canada do not use American English since neither are my native tongue. As for the instrumentation, I was confused and thought they played those instruments because of the personnel listing; if none are correct, then don't add here. The release info I am referring to is the part about the song being included as the second track on the album. --K. Peake14:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Retitle to Release and promotion due to not only release info being moved but the single release already being here and the merging that can be done with this and the following section; commercial info can be in a release para on some occasions
"released as a radio single" → "released as the album's lead single" with the wikilink
4 only says the triple-A radio release was on September 9 so reword accordingly, but the Modern Rock and Rock stations release on September 23 should also be mentioned
"It continued to rise up the chart over" → "The song continued to rise up the chart during" because the weeks are not fully sourced
"on November 25." → "on November 25, 1996."
Per WP:CHARTS, remove the descending of the song but you can keep the number of weeks it logged on the chart
"it is their highest-peaking single" → "the song is Crash Test Dummies' highest-peaking single"
Remove the discography in brackets since Wiki articles are not allowed to be used as sources and either add a citation for their RPM chart history after the comma or remove this info
"was the country's 23rd-most-successful single of" → "was the 23rd most-successful single on the RPM 100 Hit Tracks chart in"
"It also appeared on" → ""He Liked to Feel It" also appeared on"
"rankings, achieving peaks of number seven and number 21," → "weekly rankings, achieving peaks of numbers seven and 21," to avoid confusion
"In the United States," → "In the US,"
Remove the part about not appearing on any other charts since the source does not directly state this
"where it climbed to number 18" → "where it peaked at number 18"
Someone once said this wasn't the wisest idea, but the only way I can cite CTD's discography is to search for the band's name on LAC, and I'll also have to add citations for the Canadian Singles Chart and Canadian Hot 100 to ensure all official charts are covered. It'll be one hell of a search, but I can't think of any other way. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Are you sure the writer and producer credits for the members shouldn't be listed under Crash Test Dummies to avoid repeating their names, plus the writing and production area has enough others credited there for them to be removed?
Separate Dan Roberts and Michel Dorge; same goes for Peter Robertson and Maria Miccio; retitle this sub-heading to Recording if the writing and production info is moved though
I usually separate the band members and writing/production if there is a long Personnel section, because if there's a huge blank space on the right side of the page, I get a little itchy. Something like this is okay, though. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
WP:OVERLINK of RPM and Library and Archives Canada on refs 6, 8, 9 and 18
WP:OVERLINK of RPM on ref 13
WP:OVERLINK of Brett Attwood and Billboard on ref 14
WP:OVERLINK of Crash Test Dummies and Arista Records on refs 15, 16 and 17
Could you re-number the refs, please? I changed some things around.
Oh, and I don't know how to archive via tools. I'm not a very technical user. I don't even use Twinkle. What should I do? ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Wow, that was easier than I thought. I guess I just prefer doing things the hard way. Anyway, everything's delinked and archived. DoneResPM (T🔈🎵C) 14:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but this should not take too long since it's a short article and in decent shape! --K. Peake09:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Kyle Peake: Okay I think I've taken care of everything. Any final notes about the changes made? I'm particular interested in the Release history table since, as I said before, I haven't made one this complex before. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 14:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@ResolutionsPerMinute: You still need to remove wikilink on studio album, change the writing sentence to beginning with the song, switch the writing/production with recording in the opening section, remove the introduction to Brad Roberts in the body, switch the order of the instrumentation to being before the lyrical meaning in the second para, mention the date it was included on the album. Regarding the release table, it is a neat addition but you need to change Format → Format(s) and separate different ones like in the same manner used for "Fade", as well as add a row like that one for the refs. Otherwise, nice job here! --K. Peake16:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Gotcha. The one thing I had trouble with was change the writing sentence to beginning with the song. I didn't know what you meant by that. Did I happen to remedy it or is it still present? ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 17:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done here. ResPM (T🔈 🎵C) 14:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but this should not take too long since it's a short article and in decent shape! --K. Peake 09:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)