Talk:Healthcare in Senegal/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Piotrus (talk · contribs) 09:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   It is recommended per WP:LEAD that the lead should summarize the article rather then offer unique information. This lead, however, instead of summarizing the article, does just that - for example the 54% figure used there is not mentioned elsewhere; this continues for most other claims in lead (such as the number of hospitals). 2) My second concern is too few blue links (WP:BTW) and imprecise terms; for example section"Organization of the health care system" mentions "minister’s office" - but we are not told which ministry is it. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC).

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Before I devote time to this review, seeing as it is for a student assignment with the principal author and nom (Heidimkahle (talk · contribs)) not active since mid April, I first want to verify thee's a party interesting in improving this before doing a throughout review. If not, I will have to quickfail it (which would be a shame, because the article seems like a really nice piece of work...). For now I've highlighted a few issues. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Failed, due to no interest from the nominator. Another student-fueled waste of GA reviewer time. Sigh. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)