Talk:Heart of Slough
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Initial Work
edit- Well after 3 years of putting it off, I've started initial work on the article, it needs to be expanded and would be useful to add some of the design images...
Kwikblade —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.212.181 (talk) 11:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Biased point of view?
editThe text reads like a PR puff-piece with lots of buzzwords and a generally positive spin put on everything. It should really be re-written with a more neutral and factual point of view. 109.231.230.146 (talk) 15:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Heart of Slough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090718215029/http://www.slough.gov.uk/news/articles/19344.aspx to http://www.slough.gov.uk/news/articles/19344.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150724203905/http://www.maidenhead-advertiser.co.uk/news/article-15508-video-heart-of-slough-project-begins-450m-work/ to http://www.maidenhead-advertiser.co.uk/news/article-15508-video-heart-of-slough-project-begins-450m-work/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)