Talk:Heather Humphreys

Description

Hi, I've edited Heather Humphreys in an attempt at compromise. So, rather than foisting your Pov and OR on her, I used a quote from the source you provided, i.e. her own words. I've also removed the ref from a blog as that falls under unreliable refs. I would also appreciate it if you don't link your pet article here. Snappy (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Snappy, insisting someone who desribes themselves as a Protestant Ulsterwoman is not an Ulster Protestant doesn't come across as much of a compromise. Gob Lofa (talk) 12:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

If a link were required, either Protestantism in Ireland or Protestant Irish nationalists would be more appropriate then your pov fork article. Snappy (talk)

Why do you say "pov" and "fork"? Gob Lofa (talk) 12:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Because your article is a pov fork of Protestantism in Ireland. Snappy (talk) 13:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

What point of view are you referring to? Gob Lofa (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

I must be asking you the same question for nigh on two years. Will you ever answer it? Gob Lofa (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

I've answered the same questions over and over again. You just won't accept an answer and keep asking again. This being a case in point. All you do is keep asking questions and having endless pointless discussions. See Talk:Billy Fox as an example. Snappy (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes you have, just a pity they're never the questions I ask. Why would I accept an answer that dodges the question? Case in point, what point of view are you talking about? If you feel you've already answered this question, can you show me where? Gob Lofa (talk) 15:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Read WP:POV and WP:CFORK. Snappy (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

I have. Stop dodging the question. Gob Lofa (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

From WP:NPOV (and repeated at WP:CFORK): "A POV fork is an attempt to evade the neutrality policy by creating a new article about a subject that is already treated in an article, often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts." Do you believe negative or positive viewpoints or facts are being avoided or highlighted at Ulster Protestants? Gob Lofa (talk) 17:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Any questions on Protestants of Ulster article should be discussed on that articles talk page, not here. Snappy (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

You're referring to a "pov fork article" on this talk page. Gob Lofa (talk) 21:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

See above, your comment on 13 September. Do you reckon you'll get another two years out of it? Gob Lofa (talk) 11:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

You should know, you're the current record holder on Talk:Billy Fox (politician), February 2014 to July 2015. Snappy (talk) 17:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't believe I hold any records for refusing to answer questions. If you have a question for me, fire away. Please answer mine though. Gob Lofa (talk) 12:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Any questions on Protestants of Ulster article should be discussed on that articles talk page, not here. Snappy (talk) 16:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm asking why you're referring to a "pov fork article" on this talk page and why you're deleting the link to that article from this one. If you'd like to unburden yourself about negative or positive viewpoints etc. over at that talk page also, do feel free. Gob Lofa (talk) 11:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Snappy, you haven't addressed these points either here or at the talk page you suggested. What's the story? Gob Lofa (talk) 19:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Any questions on Protestants of Ulster article should be discussed on that articles talk page, not here. Snappy (talk) 07:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

That's my point, Snappy. You're refusing to discuss the question there also, which puts your refusal here in another perspective. Gob Lofa (talk) 10:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Do you dispute this? Gob Lofa (talk) 15:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Any questions on Protestants of Ulster article should be discussed on that articles talk page, not here. Snappy (talk) 21:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

That's my point, Snappy. You're refusing to discuss the question there also, which puts your refusal here in another perspective. I can assure you, if you answer it there, I won't ask it anywhere else. Gob Lofa (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)