This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Heckler & Koch HK36 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editSorry if this article isn't up to scratch, this is my first attempt. Not sure if there's a standardized short for Heckler & Koch on here? Whether it be 'HK' or 'H&K'.
This whole article was taken word for word from "Military Small Arms of the 20th Century". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.27.151.5 (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Nope, just read the rifle's description, and it is in no way word for word. It obviously used the book as a source, but it is not copied.--LWF (talk) 03:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
HKPRO
editI have deleted a couple of citations to HKPRO.com. It is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles because its articles are anonymously posted and there's no discernible editorial review process. See WP:V for general rules, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms#HKPRO/ hkpro.com for a specific discussion of this source. Rezin (talk) 23:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)