Talk:Hedwig and the Angry Inch (musical)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2A02:14F:83:1148:84A:3B77:366E:E8CD in topic Opening paragraph

Mix-up with film?

edit

The plot section seems to mix the stage play with the film, including talking about the dvd commentary. I've not seen the play, so splitting this out is difficult. Any fans around who can do it? Or should they be merged? Discuss here. .Yobmod (talk) 12:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The inital split is discussed here. . Yobmod (talk) 12:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

He/She.

edit

I'm a chick, I watched it with a gay guyfriend, we both agree that Hedwig's botched surgery still makes him a guy; he, his, him, himself, hisself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.236.142 (talk) 10:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Botched surgery? I wondered about the title. If it refers to a (failed?) operation that left him with just a stump of his original penis, I think the article should find a family-friendly way to say so. Geo Swan (talk) 16:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

This particular question should be addressed and supported by something from the author of the musical. Through Hedwig's time in the U.S, being known as "Hedwig" is "legally" a woman. Hansel was left behind in East Berlin. I do agree that as the sex-change operation did not appear to be voluntary, and since Hansel only agreed to the crude back-alley operation for love and political reasons, this wouldn't be described as a transgendered individual; who would transition for their own identity. But, as Hedwig is a fictional character and the author is allowed artistic license to portray the themes they wish (such as specifically casting a female actress to play a male drag queen), it would be best to have a citation where the writers themselves speak on Hansel/Hedwig's identification.142.254.109.5 (talk) 10:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Derogatory/Hate Crime Nature" section of article is ridiculous

edit

Nevermind the insistence that conservatives and moderates are being "perpetually abused" and persecuted by this musical, this whole section is full of non-sequiturs--about actress Hedy Lamarr's namechange, about the (doubtful) similarity of the words "Hedwig" and "wigwam" (which somehow means this show also persecutes Native Americans????). It is a mess of colorful "editorialization" that has no place in a factual article. Somebody who is reaaaaaaaaally personally offended by the very existence of the LGBTQ community is very mad at this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.193.175 (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's utterly bizarre and looks like something that belongs on Conservapedia. 99.229.70.140 (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

== You know something is wrong with the article when it has to explain the synopsis == 96.42.56.141 (talk) 08:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hedwig and the Angry Inch (musical). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Hedwig and the Angry Inch (musical). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hedwig and the Angry Inch (musical). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed move

edit

I think this page should be moved to simply Hedwig and the Angry Inch, as the film is merely an adaptation of the musical and typically originals are allowed to have their article title be just their name (see Hadestown vs Hadestown (musical) even though the musical is arguably more well known at this point).Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Character Name

edit

The main character of this musical is Hedwig Robinson. When her mother says that she's giving Hedwig her name "Hedwig Schmidt" this is in advance of her marrying Sgt. Luther Robinson and adopting his last name. So technically, she was Hedwig Schmidt.... for about five minutes. In the stage version of the show (vs the theatrical film), Yitzhak says that "Herr Hansel Schmidt becomes Mrs. Hedwig Robinson" regarding both the marriage and the name change. Here is the line in the text of the licensed version of the play. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KissMe666 (talkcontribs) 22:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Productions" rewrite

edit

The "Productions" section needs a major rewrite, particularly the "West End" and "Germany" sections. I believe the information should be written in prose as a paragraph (like the "Brazil" section). The productions that have enough notable information can be rewritten as prose, and all other productions can be combined into one abbreviated table. I don't think there's a very good reason to create a "New Zealand" section when it's only one sentence long. (Sorry, Kiwis, I'm not trying to pick on you!)

Additionally, I feel there is just too much information displayed in this section. I haven't measured it, but it appears to be taking up over half the article's real estate. Do we really need to know the street address of the Edinburgh Fringe Festival or the exact dates of Berlin's seven runs at the same theater in three years, when the runs are sometimes mere weeks apart? Non-notable information should be removed. If I have sorely misunderstood the notability guidelines, then I propose the "Productions" section get its own article.

I would do this rewrite myself, but this is a rather large undertaking, and, frankly, I'm not up to the task right now.
JDCAce (talk) 07:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Opening paragraph

edit

What’s the deal with this part in the opening paragraph? “The character of Hedwig was inspired by glam punk trans gender star Wayne/Jayne County,not by a German divorced U.S. Army wife who was Mitchell's family babysitter and moonlighted as a prostitute at her trailer park home in Junction City, Kansas.”

Seems like some personal business with no sources 2A02:14F:83:1148:84A:3B77:366E:E8CD (talk) 08:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply