Talk:Helen Lewis (journalist)

Marriage

I've removed the pargraph which stated that she married Jonathan Haynes in 2010 but later divorced. This isn't supported by the cited sources, and Lewis herself has stated that it is incorrect [1]

While the original article cited does refer to a marriage in 2010 followed by a later divorce, this does not appear to be her marriage to Haynes. Unless more reliable - and relevant - information on her marital status can be sourced, it should be omitted from the article entirely as per BLP. MarkSG (talk) 12:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Lewis Law

needs to be sourced properly - just because it has been mention on twitter by the person herself does not make it notable.--ChristopheT (talk) 11:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

It's also clearly sourced to an article in Wired. --McGeddon (talk) 11:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

mentioned once by in a wired article ... but it looks like 'hype' ;) I think at the very least the 'law' should be explained (rather than just quote the the person). "the comments on any article about feminism justify feminism" leaves a lot of room for interpretation and speculation .... --ChristopheT (talk) 11:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Helen Lewis (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203013313/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/38645 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/38645
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202221644/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/37956 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/37956

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Controversy

Hi, I removed the sentence about "defending" Brett Kavanaugh as her expression of sympathy does not really amount to a "defence" of him. On the transphobia she has written a fair few comment pieces that have been received as transphobic though, some of which has been covered by PinkNews. Battleofalma (talk) 14:21, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

The Spark

Should this article mention that she has presented a BBC Radio 4 programme "The Spark", in which she interviews people with innovative ideas? Vorbee (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Yes! --TrottieTrue (talk) 03:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Watch Dogs: Legion

There's been recent coverage of the subject of this page appearing in a video game then being removed from it. See https://kotaku.com/ubisoft-to-remove-controversial-host-from-watch-dogs-le-1845596398. Should this be in the page? 80.47.137.128 (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

What's her significance?

So every "journalist" should now have a Wikipedia entry? She's a nobody. 2601:485:4200:792:7192:A5DC:D1D8:621A (talk) 05:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

You’re a nobody. 75.170.100.200 (talk) 17:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Basic information absent

Read aha born somewhere? Did she have parents? Did she go to schools?

Or did she arrive fully formed as a graduate and step straight into a career?

This really does read as a piece of publicity and not as an encyclopaedia article. Such articles do no favours to any aspirations Wikipedia might have to be taken seriously as a real encyclopaedia. 109.149.219.203 (talk) 21:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)