Talk:Helvella acetabulum/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Sasata in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:50, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I can't find anything to do! Gotta pass... it meets the greenies :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm glad the cabbage leaf Helvella meets with your GA-reviewer approval; as always, I'm grateful for the review! Sasata (talk) 16:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Results of review
editThe article Helvella acetabulum passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass