 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
No company's website
editBecause it is generic name, not a trade mark or something —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.76.110.149 (talk) 16:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the worst article on Wikipedia. Wow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.71.140.74 (talk) 01:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
What is this?
editis it a traditional candy that was recently recognized by its nutrition properties or was it recently designed regarding this topic?--Neurorebel (talk) 00:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
---It was originally invented by Dr. Hommel in Switzerland and becames popular in Russian preventive healthcare after 1917 revolution. I Soviet Russia you eat blood.
revert
edituser:Alexbrn ok so what the issue? Vatadoshufrench 21:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- Not making sense - but more generally I am nervous of implying this stuff was a "treatment" for anaemia without better sourcing (it may not have worked). The original article was in "Munchies US" (whatever that is), but see here.[1] There is plenty of stuff to expand the article without getting into medical claims I think. Alexbrn (talk) 05:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is a point of view. I have written a fact, not a point of view. This product has been used for that, it is a fact. Blood, is better absorbed when from animal natural source than from chimicals. Moreover, after the war, there was no meat for people. And i did not say that it work, i say that it has been used for that, juste like the article says. When you had revert me, it is for an opinion, your opinion. Vatadoshufrench 06:14, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
'"There is plenty of stuff to expand the article without getting into medical claims I think"'...but this product has been sell for medical concern... Vatadoshufrench 06:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- Anything biomedical requires WP:MEDRS sourcing, and iron supplementation is a complex topic (as we know from such reliable source). It should be possible to expand the article in a neutral way. If "the war" is mentioned, it should be clear which war is being referred to. Alexbrn (talk) 06:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- Alexbrn
- this source speak about hematogen too. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=LV2016030820
- if you don't know which war, don't revert, and put "which" model or another model if you think the sentence lack details
- I let you write on the article to ameliorate it with thoses 2 references.
- Vatadoshufrench 10:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that Wikipedia:Biomedical information requires WP:MEDRS sourcing (which generally does not include popular magazines), but saying that in the middle of the previous century, some people ate this with the intention of improving blood production is historical information, not biomedical information. And even if it were, "eating something with Iron in it treats iron-deficiency anemia" is barely needs a source at all. You could treat iron-deficiency anemia by licking a cast iron skillet, if that were the only source of iron available to you. There's no magic there.
- Vatadoshu, do you have a source (maybe the manfacturer's website) that provides a complete set of nutrition facts? Ideally, the article would have an infobox about nutritional values similar to what's seen at Kinder Chocolate or NutRageous#Composition. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC).
- WhatamIdoing I didn't want to turn this article into biomedical or medical thing. i had a source, that mentioned an information that is an history fact. Nothing else. i does not want to seek to turn this article into a medical article. i don't want to search for informations to turn this article into something else. i had an information, and with that, i wanted to add this in the article. You know trepanation has been used to treat illness. It is an history fact. It does not egual to say that it had worked. It seems you want to make me saying something i don't. I do not know if it worked, i said it has been used for that at the beginning, and now, people use it more like a candy, because they like the taste they have been grown on. Vatadoshufrench 15:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that it would be appropriate to treat this article like the subject is candy, and that means adding information that is typical for other kinds of food (such as how much sugar is in it). I can't read Russian, so it's a bit hard for me to find information about this product. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- WhatamIdoing I didn't want to turn this article into biomedical or medical thing. i had a source, that mentioned an information that is an history fact. Nothing else. i does not want to seek to turn this article into a medical article. i don't want to search for informations to turn this article into something else. i had an information, and with that, i wanted to add this in the article. You know trepanation has been used to treat illness. It is an history fact. It does not egual to say that it had worked. It seems you want to make me saying something i don't. I do not know if it worked, i said it has been used for that at the beginning, and now, people use it more like a candy, because they like the taste they have been grown on. Vatadoshufrench 15:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)