Talk:Hemileia coffeicola

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Possible Source of More Detailed Information

edit

I have found an old French document which contains quiet a detailed study of Hemileia Coffeicola. I could translate it and use it as a source for this page but I'm not sure if I would need to get someone to verify my translation or if I can do this myself. I would be able to expand this page considerably if I could use this as a source. If anyone is a francophone who would be willing to check my translation let me know. Otherwise feel free to check the document for yourself: IFCC Dossier Describing Hemileia Coffeicola (1985) Tommarquand 14:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommarquand (talkcontribs)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hemileia coffeicola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply