This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
The reason for the number and presentation of the references appears to be that the entire page was plagiarized from: Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. 1990. Remote Sensing Reviews:5(1), 13-29. That, of course, is the one reference which doesn't appear on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conifere (talk • contribs) 19:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Note that the 1990 review is the first source cited, that the review was largely derived from a 1989 publication that is in the public domain, and that there is also significant content from more recent sources published after the 1990. Pmrich (talk) 05:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply