Talk:Henin–S. Williams rivalry
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Vague claim
edit"Their rivalry has become one of the most controversial and competitive contests between two female players" - Please could you explain why it is one of the most controversial? The lack of clarification in this article makes me question how worthy of it's own article this "rivalry" is, especially seeing as they only played against each other 14 times, that doesn't seem like enough to merit the label of "rivalry". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.125.49.252 (talk) 20:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed. Controversial is too heavy a word. At most you could say that the rivalry was heated. It was written about because Henin showed gamesmanship on one occasion, which might have caused Williams the match, and because the mere existence of Williams solicited quite a few bigoted, if not racist, responses from media and some players.CrashTestSmartie (talk) 09:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Henin–S. Williams rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140305193747/http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/25/eight-years-later-serena-williams-cant-get-over-justine-henin/ to http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/25/eight-years-later-serena-williams-cant-get-over-justine-henin/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)