Wikipedia

Talk:Henri Cochet

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 212.61.12.100 in topic Eileen Benett
Learn more about this page
Good articleHenri Cochet has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 3, 2017Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 1, 2019.

Biography assessment rating comment

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 01:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:3 Musketeers cropped.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:3 Musketeers cropped.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

1922 French considered a slam by the tennis channel

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

http://www.tennischannel.com/goat/gallery4.aspx

We have ONE POV/OWN editor, Fyunclick, who violates Wikipedia policy by imposing his own anti-French bias, when even major sources such as the Encyclopedia Britannica, World Almanac, ESPN, and the Tennis Channel count pre-1925 French championships as "slam" titles.Ryoung122 14:17, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kinda funny... every so often we have this multi-banned editor telling lies and getting a burr under his saddle. Just out of the blue. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:03, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Henri Cochet/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 03:11, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  


A few things to clean up:

  • "Also in 1921 he won the military Championship of France." Either military should be capitalised, or championship should not, but something should be done about that.
    • Done
  • The second paragraph of the "Rise to Prominence section" only mentions Cochet by name once, near the end, and instead relies on "he" throughout. It would be appropriate to both use his name earlier in the paragraph, and switch it up a bit throughout. This seems to be a recurring issue throughout, so I'd give it a look through, especially as I changed one where the use of "he" implied a different person won a tournament.
    • Done
  • "Although after winning the Hard and Clay Court World series..." This sentence is really awkward to read and comprehend. I believe it is referring to Cochet's rise in the world ranking, but it could be made clearer.
    • Done, rephrased
  • It also has a note to "A" but there is no section for that.
    • Done, found the note in the history of editor Lajbi's sandbox. Was probably lost in migration from sandbox to article.
  • "The same day he was ranked third in the world..." There is no mention of what day that is, aside from being in October sometime. I'd either specify the date itself, or just drop that mention altogether.
    • Done, changed to week, in line with sources
  • "The final saw Jean Borotra forfeiting to Cochet." Any reason why Borotra forfeited?
    • Not done, the free snippet of the citation does not mention this and I have been unable to find another source.
      • Understandable, and too bad for that.
  • "French dominance" section has a note to "B" and again no section for those notes to appear.
    • Done, found the note in the history of editor Lajbi's sandbox. Was probably lost in migration from sandbox to article.
  • "Then he set out for an exhibition tour through central Europe in June, playing in Budapest, Belgrade and Vienna." Is there any details regarding this tour? It would be best to either fill it out, or add it to the end of the preceding paragraph.
    • Not done (yet), this was a minor tour event and as yet have found no additional details on it.
  • "These losses sealed the fate of the year-end rankings." This should have a citation.
    • Done, added reference
  • "Cochet turned professional for a guaranteed payment of £25.000..." Who guaranteed this fee?
    • Done, he signed with Tilden Tennis Tour, added reference
  • "...they were challenged by the Pilo Facondi and Perico Facondi Chile's leading professionals but subsequently lost to Henri." This is unclear: did the Chileans lose to Cochet, and if so why is his first name being used here?
    • Done, rephrased to clarify that they bost lost their match against Cochet but did manage to win at least one set.
  • "...highlighted by a Tilden-Cochet match finished by an eight to two overall head to head in favor of Tilden." Again unclear here: did Tilden win the majority of the matches between him and Cochet on these tours?
    • Done, rephrased to clarify that Tilden won eight of the ten matches against Cochet on this tour.
  • "In December 1941 he regained his amateur status granted by the French Tennis Association." Is there any reason why he regained amateur status?
    • Done, added explanation that this was in line with the sports policy of the Vichy regime during WWII which opposed professionalism. Added reference.
  • Inconsistency with capitalising "French Riviera" throughout.
    • Done, standardized on French Riviera, per article title
  • As the personal life section is so short, it may be better to combine it with the early life section at the top.
    • Not done, prefer to keep them separate for chronological reason. Added a sentence on his death to the section.
      • Just need a citation for his death now, that's missing.
        • Done, added reference.
  • There is also a major amount of duplicate linking to articles. This script can help point out where they are.
    • Done, installed the script and removed a significant number of duplinks within sections. In a long article like this a certain level of duplinking has my preference for the convenience of the reader, so I focused on duplinks within either sections or long paragraphs that approximately fill the screen.
      • Definitely a lot better now. I'd say there is still quite a few, but that's more personal preference and can agree with your argument for the way it is.
  • References: 64, 68, and 146 are dead. 15 is missing a title.
    • Fixed
  • This article could also do with some major copyediting, as the wording at times is quite rough. WP:COPYEDITORS may be able to help you there, as I am not that strong on that front. This won't be a factor in passing or not, but it would still be a good idea to do.
    • Done, agree with this assessment. I have done some copyediting to make certain sentences run smoother and at a minimum make them comply with the requirement 1a: "The meaning of each sentence or paragraph is clear and not confusing." Also caught a few spelling errors which were corrected. Update: have gone the through the entire article again yesterday and made several additional copyedits, mostly minor, to improve the flow of the prose.

If the above are taken care of it should be good. I'll take another look when completed though. Kaiser matias (talk) 03:11, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 25 external links on Henri Cochet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Eileen Benett

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Eileen Benett that he won doubles titles with links to someone I suspect to be the wrong Eileen Benett, as she would have been 9 at the time of their US open win. 212.61.12.100 (talk) 08:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Henri_Cochet&oldid=1206731294"