Talk:Henry DeWolf Smyth/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 08:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

I am please with the content in the article thus far. I am impressed with the depth that the article goes into. The only problem is are minor ones dealing with the references and disambiguation links. I think the article would be better off using something similar to the example provided in WP:CITESHORT.

For example, the citation in ref#27 is not appropriate as the full reference of Bird & Sherman cannot be readily found. Being that there are several other instances of books being cited many time with the only citation difference being the page numbers, the References format would be better off having a "References" section with all the single-use sources and short citations and then have a section below of "Works cited" having the multiply-use sources there.

There are also multiple disambiguation links in the article. You can find them by clicking on the link in the toolbox on the side. I will place the article review on hold until these items are addressed. Happy editing! --Tea with toast (話) 17:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I've done all you suggested. Lagrange613 19:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Final review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Great work! --Tea with toast (話) 03:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)