Talk:Henry I of England/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 04:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Initial comments

I didn't make it very far in this one before needing to take a break, but here's a question before I forget it. (Here in the US, nobody tells us much that happened before the year 1776, so you may need to be patient with my questions throughout this review.)

• "William Rufus's plans for the invasion of England began to falter" -- I may be losing the thread here, but hasn't WR already crossed the channel and been crowned king? (i.e., should this be Robert who's planning to invade England?) -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:57, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

• This has now been changed to Robert by another user. -- Khazar2 (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

More:

• "strengthened it additional central governmental institutions" -- is there a word missing in this phrase?
• "after around 1110" -- this can probably be written as "around 1110" or "after 1110", but I'm not sure both modifiers are needed.
• I've made various small copyedits as I went for both proofreading and style. Please feel free to revert any you disagree with, and double-check me to make sure I haven't accidentally done more harm than good.

The article appears excellent on this first pass: well written and well sourced, and comparing it to other websites about Henry I, appears to cover all essential points and then some. (Indeed, this is probably ready for a Featured Article candidacy after a little more proofreading.) Thanks for this terrific piece of work. -- Khazar2 (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! Changes made, and the image tags should be correct now. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	See minor questions above.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	File:Henry I of England.jpg, File:Odo bayeux tapestry.png, File:Matylda zena.jpg, File:HenryI.jpg, File:Sceau de Louis VI.jpg, File:Henry I coins.jpg, File:Llyfr Coch Hergest 240-241.JPG all technically need US public domain tags, though all of them clearly are public domain.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass