Talk:Henry Livingston Jr.

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Major cleanup

edit

The article included much genealogical detail unrelated to the subject's notability, and could probably be trimmed further. It also relied almost exclusively on a partisan website as its source, though I was able to find a NYT article that also gives this minority view some credence. DavidOaks (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

lead

edit

I won't revert, because it's a pretty subtle matter, but this diff[1] doesn't seem to me to be an improvement -- it seems to lean in the direction of giving this minority family view more credence than the general state of knowledge on the question supports. Other views? DavidOaks (talk) 23:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Henry Livingston Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply