Talk:Heraclius/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

I've done a quick couple of read-throughs and have seen the "copyedit" flag. At this point in the time, not withstanding that flag, the article appears to have a reasonable likelihood of becoming a GA by the end of the review. I will now do a more detailed review; and will try and fix any copy editing problems that I encounter. This might take a day of so, but the review should be finished before the end of the weekend. Pyrotec (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this GA-status. Congraultations on your efforts. Pyrotec (talk) 09:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)