 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pronunciation
editShould the first words of the article be "A heraldic bucket shop" rather than "An heraldic bucket shop"? Best as I can tell, the 'h' in herald, heraldy, heraldic, etc. is not silent. --134.129.9.146 (talk) 16:00, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- That's the well-known old "an historic" dilemma. "An" is allowable in such cases in some styles of usage (though perhaps a little old-fashioned). Try this google search to turn up discussions of the matter: [1] -- AnonMoos (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Slim to none
editIf someone named Smith has no patrilineal descent from the original Smith, then how did they get that name? (Smith's a bad example, probably having been bestowed on several people at once; but more unique names might be clear indicators of patrilineal descent in any culture where children typically take the surname of their father.)
198.207.0.5 (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Surname founders and people who were granted or confirmed in a right to a coat of arms were almost never the same people. If John Q. Hassenpfeffer was granted a coat of arms in 1762, then generally only his direct descendants would have a legitimate right to use this particular coat of arms -- all the other Hassenpfeffers in the world would be out of luck. AnonMoos (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Modus operandi
editThe great majority of bucket shops seem to care about exactly and only one thing -- having a pretty-looking and/or impressive-seeming coat of arms image to sell to any and every reasonably-common European-sounding surname. The bucket shops promote an idea of a simple and direct association between surnames and heraldic shields which is simply false for the great majority of European heraldic traditions (with only a few semi-obscure partial exceptions, such as Polish nobility)... AnonMoos (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Lord Lyon
editShould probably mention Lord Lyon King of Arms, since that's the pretty much only authority in the world which is actively cracking down on heraldic fraud (other than in the context of trademark infringement)... AnonMoos (talk) 22:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)