Talk:Herbal Essences

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vandalism

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has been so heavily vandalized that I'm not even sure what to leave in it. It needs to be rewritten. --N-k (talk) 03:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Clairol vs. P&G

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It would be nice if the article could explain how Herbal Essences is by Clairol, but yet owned by P&G. I don't think P&G owns Clairol, do they? Clairol is owned by Coty, Inc.. Thanks! 73.101.167.59 (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Is the Original Herbal Essences Shampoo Being Made ANYWHERE?

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The problem with the complete rebranding and restructuring of the original Herbal Essence shampoo is that it was a disaster. The early version was a delight to use, had a ravishing scent like no other, and left you with hair that shone and bounced. Not one of the faux Herbal Essence shampoos of 2024 even come close. P&G mangled the essential list of ingredients beyond recognition, hoping to be seen as truly "clean and natural." Did they think that fans of the original shampoo wouldn't notice that it now smelled bad? The article should, at the very least, give information about facsimile shampoos that resemble the original. Or even factories in foreign places that, legally or not, make it. And P&G should take the bold step of producing a small test run of the early, authentic Herbal Essence. They might be surprised at the reception. Younggoldchip (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic