Talk:Herman Cain/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 02:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Criteria

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   Two citation needed tags in the article covering a significant amount of content.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Biography does not appear to have been updated since 2013.

   B. Focused (see summary style):

   WP:RECENTISM

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Four large paragraphs devoted to unproven sexual harassment claims from 2011?

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I'm quick-failing this for the above reasons. A message has been left on the nominator's talk page reminding them of the importance of being a significant contributor so as to avoid future quick fails. Viriditas (talk) 02:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)