Talk:Hermes Europe
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hermes Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141226193750/http://catalogueexchange.co.uk/catalogue_exchange_news_details.asp?id=556 to http://catalogueexchange.co.uk/catalogue_exchange_news_details.asp?id=556
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.logisticsmanager.com/Articles/22122/Hermes%20extends%20UK%20ParcelShops%20with%20Payzone.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Section on Performance
editThis appears to be highly dubious and should be flagged as such. Without credible evidence to the contrary, this appears to have been added by Evri themselves as a form of marketing as "fact". Citations to marketing outlets do not constitute factual information in this regard. The criticism section - which provides evidence of Evri's poor performance, and potential criminality - does not align with the information provided in the "performance" section. 109.145.215.90 (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps it would be better if the Wikipedia article quoted the source, which says
The partnership comes despite Evri facing customer ire over the Christmas period where many parcels were severely delayed. The delivery giant was forced to apologise when some customers had not received their packages by mid-January after staff shortages, Royal Mail strikes and bad weather contributed to delays.
I am not sure that the stuff about the Amazon trial is worth mentioning - of course they are going to perform well on a trial - it is how they normally perform that matters.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)