This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In the book by Stuart Stirling on Pizarro I've seen dates of life 1501-1578. On the other hand, I've also read in other sources that he lived for 100 years. Can anyone explain this discrepancy? Jasra21:10, 31 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have changed "legitimate" to "born in wedlock" because I think the latter phrase is more neutral and descriptive. The term "legtimate" seems vague to me, mainly because it leaves one to guess at what is the source of the legitimacy. Ultimately of course it links to the discussion at Legitimacy (law) where it is obvious that marital status is what is at issue. But still this discussion seems too narrow to me. "in wedlock" links to the same discussion for lack of anything better, but a discussion of various cultural (including legal) implications of circumstances of birth would probably be the best sort of article. It is probably just a matter of finding it. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The legitimate son of his brother Francisco, whose name was Francisco, too (born 1539, died 1557) did NOT marry Hernando’s sister Inés but his brother Gonzalo’s daughter Inés. (ref: John Hemming: The Conquest of the Incas. Mariner Books, 2003, ISBN 978-0-15-602826-4, p. 276–277.) — Wassermaus (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply