Talk:Herr Christ, der einge Gottessohn, BWV 96/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


My last one, I promise JAGUAR  22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    "adding sparkle by a "dancing" soprano" - sparkle?
    "Bach performed the cantata again in later years" - any exact date?
    "The Gospel asks how Jesus" - gospel isn't capitalised in the lead
    "John Eliot Gardiner, who conducted in 2000 the Bach Cantata Pilgrimage and conducted this cantata" - a bit choppy due to repetition of "conducted"
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

This article has been exceptionally good. I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, well done!   JAGUAR  16:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply