Talk:Heterocheila

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Monotypic taxon

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Attention Stemonitis Not sure what the monotypic taxon thing is about. At least two species have been described. Or were you referring to there being only one genus? JonRichfield (talk) 16:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yep, exactly that. There is a long-standing consensus (see WP:TOL) that where two taxa cover the same set of organisms (i.e. "monotypy" in the normal sense, not in the purist's "only one type specimen" sense), there should be a single article covering both, and placed at the lower rank, with the exception of monotypic genera, which are put at the genus title for simplicity's sake. --Stemonitis (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh. OK. Now, you said: "never manually add a stub category" in your edit description. Could you please explain or point me at an explanatory article? If I remember correctly I created the stub without a category (oversight) then got a message (automated as I remember) asking me to add a category. What should I have done (apart from including the category from scratch). (Not complaining; asking.) JonRichfield (talk) 12:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Is Heteroceilidae a valid insect taxon name?

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I got here by a link to Heterocheilidae from the article List of nematode families. The given context was

(Phylum nematoda)

Class Chromadorea

Subclass Chromadoria

Order Rhabditida
- Suborder Spirurina
  - Infraorder Ascaridomorpha
    - Superfamily Ascaridoidea Baird, 1853
      - Heterocheilidae Railliet & Henry, 1915

If this is true, then Heterocheilidae was established for a nematode taxon in 1915. On the other hand, the taxobox in the article Heterocheila claims that Heterocheilidae was established for an insect taxon in 1991. If this also is true, then the nematode family name should have precedence over the diptera family name, shouldn't it?

@HNdlROdU and JonRichfield: Here and here, respectively, you claimed the nematode and fly family designations with the same name. Would you please check your respective sources once more? JoergenB (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic