Talk:Heutagogy
This article was nominated for deletion on 20 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why?
editWhy would anyone delete the talk page? Heutagogy is a significant topic in instructional theory and learning theory development. (Stmullin (talk) 07:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC))
Hello
editHello I am a student from the University of South Carolina. We have an assignment to make a contribution to a Wikipedia page regarding a learning theory. We chose to read into heutagogy. One possible addition to this page would be to go into a little more detail regarding the strengths of a heutagogical approach within the overview of the article. This could be something like, "Heutagogy focuses on remaining flexible while learning. A teacher provides resources and material for the student, but the student designs the method through which the material will be processed. This way a student can determine which elements interest them and have relevance to their learning goal while constructing a curriculum that will provide the best results." [1] Glencra (talk) 04:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC) Akjenkins (talk) 04:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC) kevindorford (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
References
- ^ Hase, Stewart. "From Andragogy to Heutagogy". Retrieved 11-21-2012.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help)
Problem with Greek
editThe Greek words have a mismatch between the Greek alphabet and Latinised versions. ευρετικός is not "heurista" but "euretikos"; εφευρετικός is not "heuretikos" but "epheuretikos", and εύρημα is not "heuriskein" but "eurēma". Solri (talk) 07:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- I've edited it so that the English matches the Greek. Solri (talk) 10:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
The "h" is from the breath mark since Greek has no "h" equivalent. The proper spelling of the root verb is "εὕρημα". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.203.119.74 (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright problem
editThis article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Not a new idea, just a new word
editReferred here from WP:COIN. Note edits by Stewart Hase (talk · contribs). This appears to be someone's attempt to hang a new word on an old concept, self-determined learning, then take credit for it. Self-determined learning has a long history. The American Psychology Association has a bibliography on the subject.[1]. Under the name "self-directed learning", there's a huge amount of literature. Wikipedia redirects self-directed learning to autodidacticism. Perhaps this article should also be re-directed there. John Nagle (talk) 06:37, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- See: Waldorf School, Montessori school, and this Wired article[2]. This is well-trodden ground. John Nagle (talk) 06:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- I have boldy redirected to Autodidacticism.--ukexpat (talk) 20:09, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Self-determined learning in this sense isn't just autodidacticism (I reverted the edit redirecting it to the latter). Although I'm not an expert on this by any means, my understanding is that heutagogy is a sort of academic study of self learning from a pedagogical (an unfortunately loaded term in this context) or teaching and learning perspective (a study of how it works and how it can be used in, for example, education rather than a phenomenon of someone teaching themselves something). Note that I'm not arguing that the article is good and certainly not that we should keep any of the COI edits -- just that from the sources I looked at when it was AfDed some months ago it did seem a notable topic. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:23, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- We're in a nomenclature mess. "Heutagogy" and "self-determined learning" seem to be very similar concepts. "Self-determined learning" and "self-directed learning" are closely related. Wikipedia redirects "self-directed learning" to "Autodidacticism". But redirecting "Heutagogy" to "Autodidacticism" seems to be too big a jump.
- The distinction seem to be between "self-taught without formal educational outside help", which is autodidacticism, and "learning in a formal educational environment in which the student has substantial control over the direction taken", which is "self-determined/directed learning". Maybe we should revive "self-directed learning" as a non-redirect article, move the sections of autodidacticism which cover organized schools such as Waldorf and Montessori over there, add some of the cites from the American Psychology Association, and put in anything in "Heutagogy" that's backed by WP:RS reliable sources.
- This could use input from someone in the pedagogy field. John Nagle (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- I tried looking for sources. It's like reading Derrida. There's something related called "Education 3.0".[3]. There's Andragogy, which is just adult education. Heutagogy seems to be a spin-off from that. Here's a discussion on ResearchGate, which, while a blog, gives some sense of the confusion about the field.[4] There's a lot of activity in learner-directed education, especially since online courses became a big thing. It looks like the terminology hasn't settled out yet. John Nagle (talk) 07:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Referred the problem to the Wikipedia education project: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Education#Heutagogy, Andragogy, and all that. John Nagle (talk) 07:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Discussion there indicated that terminology in the education space is so ambiguous that they could not help. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Education/Archive_8#Heutagogy, Andragogy, and all that. John Nagle (talk) 17:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Referred the problem to the Wikipedia education project: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Education#Heutagogy, Andragogy, and all that. John Nagle (talk) 07:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- I tried looking for sources. It's like reading Derrida. There's something related called "Education 3.0".[3]. There's Andragogy, which is just adult education. Heutagogy seems to be a spin-off from that. Here's a discussion on ResearchGate, which, while a blog, gives some sense of the confusion about the field.[4] There's a lot of activity in learner-directed education, especially since online courses became a big thing. It looks like the terminology hasn't settled out yet. John Nagle (talk) 07:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Further reading list from recent COI edits
editThere were several recent COI edits which were reverted. Rescuing here a rather long further reading list added by that user which may be useful for others to improve the article. Note that a few of these are primary, but many are not (those by Hase and/or Kenyon would be primary). Copying them here because I haven't vetted them and even if I had the list is much too long to just slap at the bottom of the article. Adding hatted below. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:37, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
further reading
|
---|
|
Heutagogy entry in Wikipedia
editAs one of the two founders of heutagogy I tried to create an entry in Wikipedia. There is a significant literature about heutagogy developed since 2000.It is being used as a basis for curricula in schools, universities and other educational institutions around the globe. Two books and hundreds of papers have been written about the topic. The wikipedia page has, in my view, been subject to malicious attack for reasons that are unclear to me. In this 'Talk' about heutagog the claim has been made that it is equivalent to self-directed learning. This is completely false and clearly, whoever, made this claim has not read any of the seminal and subsequent academic world about heutagogy. Heutagogy is based in neuroscience, constructivism and the notion of human agency-not autodidactism as claimed. Again a misrepresentation.
I tried to correct these errors of understanding but was rejected due to the fact I had a vested interest in the topic. Who else should correct errors than the original author?
I would like the keepers of the gate of wikipedia to allow an entry about heutagogy to come to fruition and allow all the related academic work and debate about the concept be available. Otherwise, other sources will be seen as more relevant and up to date about a concept that is driving educational practice across the globe.
This issue also questions the validity of wikipedia given that significant achievements, knowledge and practice can be diminished as a result of misinformation and less than honest accusations.
Dr Stewart Hase, Australia Original author of heutagogy in 2000 and a significant record of publication about the topic.