Talk:Hey Daddy (Daddy's Home)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleHey Daddy (Daddy's Home) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 28, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hey Daddy (Daddy's Home)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 07:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Album images needs to be 300px or smaller to qualify for fair use.
  7. Overall: The article meets all requirements except for the image size of the album. I will put this on hold until it is fixed.
    Pass/Fail:  

Comment There is the case of unformatted reference, italicization of online sources and no alternate text for the images. Without addressing these issues the article cannot be passed. --Legolas (talk2me) 08:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing the image. Now the references need to be fixed. Please see WP:REF for more information on how references need to be presented. -- S Masters (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Everything should be fixed now! Candyo32 (talk) 23:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
There are still issues with the references. As Legolas2186 pointed out, there are italics where there shouldn't be (retrieved dates), and there are formatting codes like {{ and [[ showing. -- S Masters (talk) 04:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hopefully, everything is fixed but there is something iffy with #13, other than that I think I got everything else. Candyo32 (talk) 22:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


Final summary: Thanks for all the hard work and fixes. I am confident that the article now meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it. Well done! - S Masters (talk) 10:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hey Daddy (Daddy's Home). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply