Talk:Hey There Delilah

Review

Great Song, i have just heard it. Realy great! --Бардюк Олег Юрійович (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Parodies Section

Is it just me, or are the parodies in this article noteworthy enough to be included in this article?

I'm not sure it should be included. It needs to be at least retooled Since the professionalism decreases as you go through the section. We don't need to include every parody. Espcially since thats slowly going to increase and be longer than the article itself. I vote for keeping the top two or three, and mentioning that many more exist. Smashmore (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

AgreeMathwhiz 29 (talk) 23:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Until someone wants to defend it or it's notability I took it out. --Capi crimm (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

"Hey There Delilah" has been parodied so many times that the article would be incomplete without referencing this. Thus, I restored the Parody section on 26 March 2008, stating that the song has been the "target of numerous parodies" and citing "one representative example" that is also noteworthy. This section is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all "Delilah" parodies; such a list, as Smashmore points out above, would be longer than the article itself. Shakespeareanpie (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Inspiration and composition

This section does not site any sources. I added a tag to it, someone needs to verify all that or get rid of it. 58.161.91.37 03:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Needs Work

I'm not sure how this artical could possibly be improved, but it no doubt needs some work. Maybe a full summary of the music video could help(although, very simple). It being such a popular song, you'd think a fan or two would try and add some life to the artical, but as I said, I'm not sure how this could be made better. I might just have peices remain a stub for the time being. -FallingSkies 19:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

This page is pretty ridiculous. It's entirely subjective and personal opinion and I hereby propose it be at least merged or possibly deleted. --DaveyE 06:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The Music video sectional really needs to be expanded. ~mthefool

Fair use rationale for Image:Hey There Delilah (2006 Plain White T's single).jpg

Image:Hey There Delilah (2006 Plain White T's single).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Inspiration section contradicts itself

It seems someone added a comment in response to the writing above.

CD was released in 2005

The CD was released in 2005. I do not know why someone changed the article to say it was released in 2007. It was rereleased with their 4th album in 2007, but the original release date, as the Wikipedia article on the album states, was 2005. Therefore, it also stands to reason that the song did indeed have an late increase in popularity, over 2 years after the initial release.

This song is a cover

This article mentions nothing of the fact that it is a cover of a very creapy older song, which also disputes the whole inspiration section of this article. I don't know enough of the original to correct the article, but i feal it needs researching and correcting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.65.133.206 (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

...I'll research it, but I highly doubt that. DrowningInRoyalty 23:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

It's not a lyrical cover, but I recently heard a song that had a nearly identical melody. I'll get back to you with an artist and title. --Haizum μολὼν λαβέ 01:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

AH HAAAAA! "FEELIN' GOOD AGAIN" BY ROBERT EARL KEEN! BLATANT RIPOFF! --Haizum μολὼν λαβέ 01:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right. Strange. 12.26.115.28 03:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

It's a cover in the same way "Connection" by Elastica is a cover of "Three Girl Rhumba" by Wire Doc Strange 17:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Um, no.

Nice song... but so NOT a cover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.123.238.98 (talk) 22:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Napoleon Dynamite

Did this song feature in Napolean Dynamite at the beginning of the film? Or was that the older version? Who wrote this first version SineBot is talking about? A.J.Chesswas 20:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

That was "You and I Are Going To Be Friends" by the White Stripes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.194.27.58 (talk) 04:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Actual title of the song is "We're Going to Be Freinds", which on the White Stripes 2001 record White Blood Cells Doc Strange 17:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Bringing back Inspiration and Composition section

I believe the Inspiration and composition section needs to be brought back. It explained a great deal about the song and let readers know that the song is about a real person and what the relationship was between the two people (since most think it was a romantic relationship). It could be labeled as background, or something similar. If you go back far enough in the history of this article you will find versions [1] that have references in the inspiration section, therefore it does site at least one source. sirgregmac 20:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Well if you can find sources that are up to Wikipedia standards, (see WP:VERIFY ), then by all means bring it back. 58.161.90.38 02:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of References

Apparently the edits made by 67.116.236.200 on 28 October 2007 resulted in the deletion of the References section. I'm unsure how to restore the references. Anyone? Shakespeareanpie 23:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey There Khalilah

I Think this should be included in the Parodies section [2] It's Brilliant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.6.101.154 (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Plagorism?

Has anyone listened to the "plagarism" clip? They sound almost nothing alike. How ridiculous that this should make in on an encyclopedia. Get rid of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.138.51.29 (talk) 05:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

A blog article [3] contains the Inspiration/Composition section verbatim.

Thus it would appear that either the section of this WP article is a plagarism or the blog entry in question is a GFDL violation

Should someone investigate this?

--Phoenix9 (talk) 22:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

"Fabricated"

the revelation that its central relationship was fabricated

What does "fabricated" mean here? I read it as meaning that at the end of the song you discover that he made Delilah up, which would admittedly have been rather an awesome end to the song, but isn't anywhere in the actual lyrics. Is it a reference to how Higgenson wrote the song to a real Delilah but they were never in a real relationship? I don't think most people assume that relationships which get sung about actually happened in real life. Marnanel (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes to your second question. Shakespeareanpie (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't see how it's at all clear that the speaker is singing to someone he's in a relationship with. Knowing that Higgenson didn't actually have a relationship with the person he wrote the song about, the song's lyrics seem creepy and stalkerish, but there's nothing specifically dishonest or fabricated about them. john k (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Must the automatic assumption be that all songs are accurate accounts of actual events unless stated otherwise? Taken to the extreme, John Lennon was actually a walrus, Johnny Cash is a murderer, and Frank Zappa is an eskimo. I doubt you'd call John Lennon a liar for singing I am the Walrus, though.66.87.8.12 (talk) 08:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Delilah's In The Olympics?

I saw a reference in TIME/Newsweek that the subject of this song had made the US Olympic Team and was heading to Beijing. Is this "honest to blog" and, if true, worth putting up on Wikipedia? One Mississippi (talk) 06:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Hey There Delilah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130703062621/http://www.mtv.de/musikvideos_artist/1017-plain-white-t-s to http://www.mtv.de/musikvideos_artist/1017-plain-white-t-s
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130703062621/http://www.mtv.de/musikvideos_artist/1017-plain-white-t-s to http://www.mtv.de/musikvideos_artist/1017-plain-white-t-s

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hey There Delilah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150322052544/http://www.celebpeeps.net:80/news/Delilah_DiCrescenzo_Finally_Gives_Tom_Higgenson_Date.html to http://www.celebpeeps.net/news/Delilah_DiCrescenzo_Finally_Gives_Tom_Higgenson_Date.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520200113/http://www.ultratop.be/nl/annual.asp?year=2007 to http://www.ultratop.be/nl/annual.asp?year=2007

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hey There Delilah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.celebpeeps.net/news/Delilah_DiCrescenzo_Finally_Gives_Tom_Higgenson_Date.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150517053016/http://www.austriancharts.at/year.asp?id=2007&cat=s to http://www.austriancharts.at/year.asp?cat=s&id=2007
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ifpi.dk/?q=content%2Fguld-og-platin-i-august

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Genre change?

I've been adding emo as a genre, as that seems to be the general consensus among the public, and it keeps getting removed. They view "Hey There Delilah" as an emo song, not a folk-pop song, for a good reason. Just because a song has an a acoustic guitar base doesn't make it folk. This song has a lot more emo characteristics, such as emotionally-charged lyrics, "twinkly" guitar tones, and slightly wistful vocals. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owenmpowell (talk • contribs) 23:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

You can't just listen to it and say it's an emo song, you have to cite a reliable source. 183.171.113.19 (talk) 04:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Billboard says "emo(tional) coffee shop ballad" does not mean an emo song. 183.171.112.62 (talk) 07:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)