I don't know if anyone edits or watches this page, but the excess boldfacing makes it almost impossible to read it. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
-
- Thanks SatDis, too bad it wasn't caught early enough to revert the editor who put it on. I was looking for a particular term and just stopped because of the unusual boldfacing. The topic isn't important enough to take the time, a fan of the series should do this. Thanks for the note, nice that someone is watching the page. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
- SatDis, I spoke too soon. Reading over the page I can see the logic in the boldfacing, which makes it very easy to follow the arc of the characters. I wouldn't suggest this as a standard way of approaching television edisodes sitewide, but see the logic in it. I'm actually glad I came upon the page, interesting method. Randy Kryn (talk) 00:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
- @Randy Kryn: I should probably explain that this isn't a typical narrative-based show. Each presenter hosts their own segment, which was shown through the bolding of their names. I was informed boldface isn't an appropriate tool, so it is now a mission to remove it all. SatDis (talk) 01:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
- No, who told you that? Now that you explain that each segment has a different host, it seems perfectly clear that you've formatted it correctly, even if somewhat unusual and jarring when first come upon. Thanks for doing so, it grows on you. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply