Talk:Hidden curriculum

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bd184503. Peer reviewers: CassLong, KKato1994.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Brian

Brian Jackson or Philip Wesley Jackson? Gubbubu 12:04, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This passage seems to be from a conspiracist perspective

"For instance, it is very interesting that members of Skull and Bones in the United States have played a preponderant part as the historical designers who chose to engineer a German-Prussian pegagogy and school organization. They wanted a U.S. school experience from the start based on purposive mass behavior modification, social engineering, and centralized curricula system (based on curricula 'castes' decided by previous socioeconomic status instead of ability) instead of assumptions of individualized discernment, learning and congnitive equality."

Thanks

Not only is it a conspiracy theory, it is irrelevant. It discusses overt curriculum design, not the hidden curriculum. I removed it.Cherlin 22:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Unsuitable entry

Below the "Also See" section...

"Also, hidden curriculum ruins the lives of many, according to the National Association for Recovering Public School Students (NARPSS). Statistics show that students subjected to a hidden curriculum are 60% more likely to fail out of school by grade 8."

Not only was this placed outside of a clearly defined section, the tone and style is not suitable for an encyclopedia. The statement is also unsourced and NPOV. It has been deleted. King of Corsairs 00:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

So Marxist-based schooling has no hidden curriculum?

John Dewey and his followers have been overhauling American schools by now for around a century by now. Now, does anybody wonder if the new and improved anti-Capitalist, pro-diversity, group learning, student-centered schools have got a hidden curriculum? When you have an institution that officially claims to teach kids math and history but quite openly declares its allegiance to the teaching of sustainability, equality, democracy, social justice and other such topics and develops its teaching program based on that, is that a "hidden curriculum"? Or maybe it's a blatantly open curriculum, huh? 76.24.104.52 (talk) 01:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

New Section/ Sub-section Idea

I would like to add a new sub-section to this article focusing on how heteronormativity plays a role in schools through the hidden curriculum. I am working on this through the Wiki Education project. I would be open to anyones thoughts or suggestions on references!

Potential Bibliography for additions:

Alsubaie, M. A. (2015). Hidden curriculum as one of current issue of curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(33), 125–128.

Chesir-Teran, D., & Hughes, D. (2009). Heterosexism in high school and victimization among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning students. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 38(7), 963–975. Retrieved from http://www.library.ohiou.edu/ezpauth/redir/athens.php?http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.ebscoho st.com%2Flogin.aspx%3Fdirect%3Dtrue%26db%3Dsih%26AN%3D41581764%26site% 3Deds-live%26scope%3Dsite

Martin, K. (1998). Becoming a gendered body. American Sociological Review (63)3, 494=511.

Preston, M. J. (2016). “They’re just not mature right now”: Teachers’ complicated perceptions of gender and anti-queer bullying. Sex Education, 16(1), 22–34. http://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1019665

Toomey, R. B., McGuire, J. K., & Russell, S. T. (2012). Heteronormativity, school climates, and perceived safety for gender nonconforming peers. Journal Of Adolescence, 35(1), 187-196. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.03.001

Yep, G. A. (2002). From homophobia and heterosexism to heteronormativity. Journal of Lesbian Studies. http://doi.org/10.1300/J155v06n03_14 Bd184503 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Addition Made to Aspects Section

I have added a subsection to the "aspects" section on the hidden curriculum of heteronormatity, Bd184503 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Edits Made

I have added additional Wiki links to articles, as well as cleaned up some other place issues within the article. 64.247.113.169 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:29, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Punctuation and citation edits made to the introductory section. Minor edits to wording made in the heteronormativity section. Bd184503 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:53, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

In relation to Windows 95 Operating system including "games"

Discussed elsewhere (https://www.thescienceexplorer.com/how-microsoft-tricked-its-users-through-games-678), this page mainly discusses Hidden Curriculum in the context of formal educational systems and the negative impacts. However it might be appropriate to connect this topic to sources of positive impacts of hidden curriculum, such as the one discussing how software included standard in operating systems taught users to use a mouse without explicitly doing so etc.

It might also be useful to bring video game tutorial design into the conversation such as Super Mario Bros level 1-1 147.56.69.45 (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)