This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There's a template that says that this article disagrees with another article. Please see discussion. However, there is no discussion. How am I supposed to figure out in what way they contradict if no one's mentioned anything? 75.159.45.228 (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Christopher J Blunt wrote about the history of hie]rarchies of evidence, probably one of the only expert resources on this topic:[1][2]. This is unfortunately self-published (although he wrote a PhD Thesis on the topic, maybe there are duplicated information there), but may be of interest nevertheless, given the paucity of expert information on the topic. Best regards. --Lyrono (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
